I keep reading debates about whether the UConn Huskies, because of their current winning streak, are good for Women’s College Basketball. It’s nice to see the attention paid to the sport, but I don’t understand the debate, if for no other reason than it’s premature.
Yes, the Huskies are currently riding a 77 game winning streak. But let’s keep it in perspective: during the streak, they have to date won exactly 1 National Championship. Any talk about a UConn dynasty can only commence if they defeat Stanford tonight for the National Championship, which would give them two undefeated championship seasons in a row.
And why is everyone conceding the championship to the Huskies? Stanford is a team that lost to UConn in the Final Four last season, and then lost only guard Jillian Harmon and returned J.J. Hones from injury. UConn lost Renee Montgomery and returned Caroline Doty from injury. Yes, UConn defeated them earlier in the season. But Stanford led at the half and only lost by 12 points — and that game was played at Connecticut.
Yes, I believe that UConn will win tonight — but Stanford is an excellent team, and it will be a battle.
The last team to defeat the Huskies? That would be Stanford, two seasons ago in the National Semifinal game.
The women’s game has not achieved the same level of parity as the men’s game, where Syracuse rose this year from unranked to a #1 ranking; where preseason #1 Kansas was defeated by mid-major Northern Iowa; where mid-major Butler University scrapped their way to the National Championship game. Sure, Nebraska was probably a bit of surprise this season, and no one had Baylor in the Final Four — but only because the Bears were expected to need another year of experience. In the women’s game, the difference between the haves and the have nots is greater than in the men’s game.
It’s not as if Connecticut stands head and shoulders above all of college basketball. If there’s even a debate, it might be over which program is better: UConn, with 6 National Championships, or Tennessee, with 8. I’m not even sure there’s a debate yet: Tennessee has won more titles, and they went back-to-back as recently as 2007 and 2008, so it’s not as if they won all of their titles 30 years and are no longer relevant. And Stanford is a perennial contender, and has been for 20 years. Rutgers, Notre Dame, Duke, North Carolina and Baylor have all been solid.
It’s not even as if Connecticut has such a reputation that they recruit all of the top talent, either. I would debate whether Geno Auriemma recruits as well as John Calipari or Roy Williams or Mike Krzyzewski on the men’s side. Yes, there’s Maya Moore, who was the #1 recruit when she came on board, as was Tina Charles; UConn also landed #1 player Elena Della Donne, who never played for the Huskies. Overall, UConn has 8 Top 100 players on the current roster — for comparison, Stanford has 12, and Baylor has 7, and I suspect that Tennessee is right up there as well.
Here are UConn’ current Top 100 recruits:
Tina Charles: #1
Maya Moore: #1
Caroline Doty: #10
Tiffany Hayes: #11
Lorin Dixon: #19
Heather Buck: #31
Kelly Faris: #39
Kaili McLaren: #46
I must admit that I wasn’t paying attention to college basketball back then, but did people debate whether UCLA was good for college basketball when they won 88 games in a row, 7 consecutive National Championships, and 10 out of 12? It’s too bad that the UCLA run ruined the game!
Can we at least table the debate until after tonight’s championship game?